Ethical Considerations in Cosmic Justice

Once thriving ecosystems on Earth are now desolate due to human activity. Habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change are primary causes. This loss showcases the extensive impact humanity has on its environment.

The concept of 'absolute karma' implies a balance of actions and consequences. However, destroying universes for retribution contradicts the karmic principle of non-harming, suggesting that revenge on a cosmic scale is ethically questionable.

If multiple universes exist, their interconnectedness could mean that actions in one have ripple effects in others. The destruction of universes could disrupt this balance, leading to unforeseen, possibly catastrophic, outcomes.

The moral implications of 'remaking' universes raise questions. What gives one the right to judge and enact cosmic justice? Such actions could be seen as playing god, with ethical consequences we are ill-equipped to understand.

Restoring karma universally would require omniscience to understand the intricate balance of actions across time and space. Humans lack this capability, making it presumptuous to consider such an undertaking.

Rather than destruction, a focus on restoration and healing within our own universe may be a more ethical and practical approach. Emphasizing conservation, empathy, and sustainable living could help repair our home without harming others.